THIS is the last chance to enter your firm or individuals into the British Accountancy Awards. The deadline for entries into the profession’s awards expires tomorrow, 29 July. Now in...
AAT has long called for action to be taken against overseas residential property investors; briefing all MPs, including the Prime Minister and Housing Minister, on the subject last year and again as recently as June 2018.
In 2017, AAT members were asked, “Should an additional tax be paid on property purchases by overseas investors?” 78% said “Yes” compared to just 14% who said “No”.
As a result, the organisation is naturally pleased that the Prime Minister has confirmed the Government’s intention to levy an additional Stamp Duty charge on overseas residential investors.
Phil Hall, AAT Head of Public Affairs & Public Policy, said:
“Put simply, it doesn’t matter how many houses are built in the UK, there will never be enough to meet demand because demand is not simply coming from the 65m currently resident in the UK but from across, Europe, Asia and America.
Years of London property purchases by the super-rich from Russia, China, America and various other countries are well documented but it’s not just London that overseas investors are setting their sights on. Liverpool, Manchester and other parts of the UK are proving equally attractive. What’s more, it is no longer the super-rich alone who are snapping up properties across the country.
Middle income earners from across the world, especially China, Malaysia and Singapore, are finding UK property an increasingly attractive proposition. This has been exacerbated by the weakness of sterling following Brexit. The Prime Minister’s recently stated intention to impose an additional 1% Stamp Duty charge, potentially rising to 3%, on overseas residential property investors is a sensible, measured response to this increasing problem.”
There are numerous international examples of residential property purchases being successfully prevented, restricted or taxed differently. For example, property can only be purchased by residents in Singapore and Iceland. Non-residents in Poland must have either lived in the country for five years or more or can demonstrate some other form of significant connection to the country e.g. marriage to a Polish citizen. Similarly, Denmark and Hungary impose some limits on who can buy property within their borders and Australia and New Zealand have imposed restrictions as a direct result of an explosion in overseas property acquisitions, primarily from China.
Prime Minister, Theresa May MP, said:
“Britain will always be open to people who want to live, work and build a life here. However, it cannot be right that it is as easy for individuals who don’t live in the UK and don’t pay taxes here, as well as foreign based companies, to buy homes as hard working British residents.”
Source: AAT News